Category: Announcement

BOSTON METRO AREA RANKED LEAST DANGEROUS IN THE NATION IN SAFETY FOR PEDESTRIANS

BOSTON METRO AREA RANKED LEAST DANGEROUS IN THE NATION IN SAFETY FOR PEDESTRIANS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

May 20, 2014                                                                                               

CONTACT:

Michelle Blundell, 202.478.6176

mblundell@mrss.com

Wendy Landman, 617.367.9255

wlandman@walkboston.org

BOSTON METRO AREA RANKED LEAST DANGEROUS IN THE NATION IN SAFETY FOR PEDESTRIANS

Older adults, children most threatened by streets built for speed, not safety

BOSTON, MA – Boston is among the safest in the nation for pedestrians, ranking 1st out of the 51 largest metro areas, a new report released by the National Complete Streets Coalition, a program of Smart Growth America, said.

While many streets across the country are perilous for people walking, hundreds of communities, like the City of Boston and a number of Boston area municipalities, are working to make their streets safe and welcoming for people on foot. In recent years, scores of communities have begun to redesign roads as “complete streets,” adding sidewalks and bicycle lanes, reducing crossing distances and improving crosswalks. Such design features have helped make walking safe and comfortable for everyone.

Pedestrian safety is not only important for the lives it saves and injuries it prevents, but it also promotes vibrant businesses, attracts tourists, reduces pollution and allows for healthier communities with increased physical activity.

Though the report found that Greater Boston is safer when compared to other metros across the country, 476 pedestrians were killed from 2003 to 2012 — an unacceptable number no matter Boston’s ranking. Continuing to invest resources in making our streets safe for all users is key to ending these preventable deaths.

In addition to ranking America’s major metropolitan areas according to a Pedestrian Danger Index to assess how safe pedestrians are while walking, the report, Dangerous by Design presents data on pedestrian fatalities and injuries in every U.S. metro area, state, and county. The report also includes an online, interactive map showing the locations where people walking have been fatally struck by the driver of a vehicle.

“While we should celebrate our good ranking, we must remember that the last decade has seen 476 pedestrians killed on Boston area roads, which represents almost 20 percent of all traffic fatalities,” said Wendy Landman, Executive Director of WalkBoston. “Almost 7,000 pedestrians were injured during that same period, and 34 child pedestrians died in Massachusetts from 2003 – 2010. These numbers keep us focused on a future where our streets are safe for everyone.”

These are all preventable tragedies. WalkBoston continues to work hard with state, municipal and neighborhood partners to make our streets and sidewalks safe for all walkers. WalkBoston will soon begin a new safety initiative with the Massachusetts Department of Transportation to increase traffic safety in 12 pilot communities (Brockton, Cambridge, Fall River, Haverhill, Lynn, New Bedford, Newton, Pittsfield, Quincy, Salem, Somerville and Watertown). WalkBoston is currently working with the Boston Public Schools on improving walking conditions between middle schools and nearby transit and bus stops.

The majority of pedestrian deaths occur on roadways that are dangerous by design —engineered and operated for speeding traffic with little to no provision for the safety of people walking, biking or using public transit. Sadly, older adults, children and minorities are the most at risk while walking, dying in disproportionate numbers.

“Our hardest work lies ahead in places like Blue Hill Avenue in Dorchester and Mattapan and Cambridge Street in Allston where wide streets and fast-moving cars make it less safe and less attractive for walkers,” said Landman. “By way of contrast, just ask a restaurant owner in the North End whether its attractive and safe walking environment fuels their business.”

Pedestrian safety is often perceived as a strictly local issue but, for decades, federal dollars have been invested in thousands of miles of state and local roads in the heart of communities. In fact, 68 percent of all pedestrian fatalities over the past decade occurred on federal-aid roads — roads that follow federal guidelines and are eligible to receive federal funds.

“We are allowing an epidemic of pedestrian fatalities, brought on by streets designed for speed and not safety, to take nearly 5,000 lives a year; a number that increased six percent between 2011 and 2012,” said Roger Millar, Director of the National Complete Streets Coalition. “Not only is that number simply too high, but these deaths are easily prevented through policy, design, and practice.  State and local transportation leaders need to prioritize the implementation of Complete Streets policies to improve safety for people walking.”

The federal government sets the tone for a national approach to safety, and Congress can address this critical issue by passing the Safe Streets Act as it renews the transportation law. State governments and agencies also can take a number of actions to improve pedestrian safety, starting with adopting a strong Complete Streets policy and following a comprehensive action plan to ensure the streets are planned and designed for the safety and comfort of people walking.

We look forward to the day when our services are no longer in high demand. We aren’t there yet. So, lets celebrate our accomplishments but remain dedicated to a future of complete streets and safety for all.

To view the full report, please click here.

###

­­­­­About The National Complete Streets Coalition
The National Complete Streets Coalition, a program of Smart Growth America, seeks to fundamentally transform the look, feel and function of the roads and streets in our community, by changing the way most roads are planned, designed and constructed. Complete Streets policies direct transportation planners and engineers to consistently plan and design streets with all users in mind.

About Smart Growth America
Smart Growth America is the only national organization dedicated to researching, advocating for and leading coalitions to bring better development to more communities nationwide. From providing more sidewalks to ensuring more homes are built near public transportation or that productive farms remain a part of our communities, smart growth helps make sure people across the nation can live in great neighborhoods.

About WalkBoston
WalkBoston makes walking safer and easier in Massachusetts to encourage better health, a cleaner environment and vibrant communities. Our work in 101 Massachusetts cities and towns has helped put walking on the agenda.

Final details for Dudley Sq. Walk: Re-Discover Dudley, History in the Making!

Final details for Dudley Sq. Walk: Re-Discover Dudley, History in the Making!

When you arrive at Hibernian Hall & check in, you will receive a route map & a group number on a name tag that you can fill out; as soon as 25-30 people arrive to fill the group, a walk leader from one of the partner organizations will lead your group out. Due to the number of expected attendees, groups will start to leave as early as 4:45PM & continue to leave as groups fill.

Directions to Hibernian Hall (184 Dudley Street, Boston, MA 02119) can be found at the bottom of the event page at dudleysquarewalk.eventbrite.com

After the walk, we invite you to join us on the 3rd floor of Hibernian Hall for a reception & to hear brief remarks from Mayor Martin J. Walsh about the City’s role and efforts in Dudley. ACE, Boston Housing Authority, Discover Roxbury, Dudley Square Main Streets, Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative, Madison Park Development Corporation, Nuestra Comunidad and WalkBoston will all have tables in the hall where you can learn more about each organization.

If you’re a Twitter user, we’d encourage you to use the hashtag #DudleyWalkBOS to tweet & share pictures along the route.

You can follow all the organizing groups on this Twitter list: https://twitter.com/WalkBoston/lists/may-2014-dudley-sq-walk

There is also a Facebook Event page set up for the walk:
https://www.facebook.com/events/426901314117582/427943210680059/

See you soon!

baystateroads:

Tech Note #66 – Massachusetts Speed Laws

Speed Limits & Speed Limit SettingBackground
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) defines speeding as “travelling in excess of the posted speed limit” or “driving too fast for conditions.”   Nationally, speed-related crashes account for 30 percent of all fatal crashes, resulting in over 10,000 fatalities annually and a societal cost exceeding $40 billion.  The numbers in Massachusetts are similar where 30 percent of the 349 fatalities in 2012 were speed-related.  In Massachusetts, 56 percent of speed-related fatalities occurred on roadways with a posted speed limit of 35 mph or less, and 78 percent of speed-related fatalities occurred on a roadway with a posted speed limit of 45 mph or less. From an engineering standpoint properly posted speed limits represent the front lines of speed management.  This Tech Note provides basic information regarding speed limits and guidance on proper speed limit setting and sign posting.

Speed Laws in Massachusetts
Within the Massachusetts General Laws (MGL) there are two sections that deal specifically with speed limits.
MGL Chapter 90, Section 18  allows for the posting of numerical limits on the typical speed limit sign.  This law also indicates that the limit  must  be  based  on  engineering  study  and  needs approval via a Special Speed Regulation approved by the Registry of  Motor  Vehicles (RMV)  and  MassDOT. Please note that  all regulatory speed limit signs not posted under this procedure are in violation of the law and are not legally enforceable.*
MGL Chapter 90, Section 17 applies to unposted roadways and specifically states that it shall be prima facie evidence of a rate of speed greater than is reasonable and proper as aforesaid (1) if a motor vehicle is operated on a divided highway outside a thickly settled or business district at a rate of speed exceeding fifty miles per hour for a distance of a quarter of a mile, or (2) on any other way outside a thickly settled or business district at a rate of speed exceeding forty miles per hour for a distance of a quarter of a mile, or (3) inside a thickly settled or business district at a rate of speed exceeding thirty miles per hour for a distance of one-eighth of a mile, or (4) within a school zone which may be established by a city or town as provided in section two of chapter eighty-five at a rate of speed exceeding twenty miles per hour.
*Please note there are special speed law provisions in the MGL for the Massachusetts Turnpike and Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) [formerly the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC)] Roads.

Setting Speed Limits
Municipalities should contact MassDOT to request speed limit posting on state-owned roadways. It is the responsibility of the municipality to follow the procedures for locally-owned roadways, which require approval by both MassDOT and the RMV. When considering the establishment of speed limits it is imperative that you review the following two sources which will provide specific guidance on speed zoning: (1)  Procedures for Speed Zoning on State and Municipal Roads, and (2) The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD Section 2B.13).
The establishment of a speed limit is required to be based upon an engineering study, and any resulting posting must be in increments of 5 mph. One major basis for the setting of speed limits is that most motorists are able to select a reasonable and safe speed. Using the 85th Percentile speed as a baseline, the proposed speed limit may be adjusted based upon additional factors, including, road characteristics (e.g., shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance), the pace speed, roadside development and environment, parking practices and pedestrian activity, and reported crash experience.
Engineering Study
An engineering study from the municipality must contain both the collected data and analysis of this data. Data collection includes:
1.   Preliminary study of conditions;
2.   Speed calculations of curves
(MassDOT’s responsibility);
3.   Speed observations;
4.   Studies of crash             distributions; and
5.   Trial runs over the         location.

Speed  observations  are  determined from a spot speed study and are representative  of  the  motorists “opinion” regarding the speed limit. Speeds from 100 free flow vehicles (drivers choosing their own speed, i.e., not  in  queue)  should  be  captured  in each direction.  Data analysis includes:
1.   Safe speed range;
2.   Selecting speed limits/lengths of zone;
3.   Advisory speeds; and
4.   Rechecks with trial runs.

Advisory Speeds
Special consideration should always be given to the safe speeds for curves, hills and other locations located within that portion of the section. If the safe speed determined by a Ball-Bank Indicator through a particular curved section of a roadway differs from the preceding speed zone by 10 miles per hour or less, and the curved section of roadway is less than 0.20 miles, or if engineering judgment determines that it is appropriate, a warning sign used in conjunction with an advisory speed plate indicating the safe speed can be used in lieu of establishing a separate speed zone for an isolated condition.
Section 2C-08 of the 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (M.U.T.C.D.) states: Section 2C.08 Advisory Speed Plaque (W13-1P)
Option:
01
The Advisory Speed (W13-1P) plaque (see Figure 2C-1) may be used to supplement any warning sign to indicate the advisory speed for a condition.
Standard:
02
The use of the Advisory Speed plaque for horizontal curves shall be in accordance with the information shown in Table 2C-5. The Advisory Speed plaque shall also be used where an engineering study indicates a need to advise road users of the advisory speed for other roadway conditions.
03
If used, the Advisory Speed plaque shall carry the message XX MPH. The speed displayed shall be a multiple of 5 mph.
04
Except in emergencies or when the condition is temporary, an Advisory Speed plaque shall not be installed until the advisory speed has been determined by an engineering study.
05
The Advisory Speed plaque shall only be used to supplement a warning sign and shall not be installed as a separate sign installation.

06
The advisory speed shall be determined by an engineering study that follows established engineering practices.
Unlike regulatory speed signs, advisory speed signs can be erected by municipalities without any further approval provided they comply with the M.U.T.C.D. Also, advisory speeds are not enforceable, since their intent is to advise motorists of an appropriate speed through a particular condition, not regulate it.

School Zones
The 20 mph speed limit on roads near schools can be posted in various
ways. When posting signs, it is important to consider providing motorists with information as to the beginning and end of the school zone as well as when the 20 mph speed limit is in effect. The signs stating such limits may be accompanied by flashing yellow lights or posted for certain hours of the day and days of the week.
Section 7B.15 of the 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (M.U.T.C.D.) states: Section 7B.15 School Speed Limit Assembly (S4-1P, S4-2P, S4-3P, S4-4P, S4-6P, S5-1) and END SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT Sign (S5-3)
Standard:
08
The School Speed Limit assembly shall be either a fixed-message sign assembly or a changeable message sign.
09
The fixed-message School Speed Limit assembly shall consist of a top plaque (S4-3P) with the legend SCHOOL, a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign, and a bottom plaque (S4-1P, S4-2P, S4-4P, or S4-6P) indicating the specific periods of the day and/or days of the week that the special school speed limit is in effect (see Figure 7B-1).
Option:
10
Changeable message signs (see Chapter 2L and Section 6F.60) may be used to inform drivers of the school speed limit. If the sign is internally illuminated, it may have a white legend on a black background. Changeable message signs with flashing beacons may be used for situations where greater emphasis of the special school speed limit is needed.
Guidance:
11
Even though it might not always be practical because of special features to make changeable message signs conform in all respects to the standards in this Manual for fixed-message signs, during the periods that the school speed limit is in effect, their basic shape, message, legend layout, and colors should comply with the standards for fixed-message signs.
12
A confirmation light or device to indicate that the speed limit message is in operation should be considered for inclusion on the back of the changeable message sign.

Mass Interchange, Spring 2014

 

“In advance of the first public meeting on the project, scheduled for Thursday night, the wish list for the project and accompanying free land is as wide-ranging as it is lengthy: A network of world-class bike and walking paths. A Harvard campus expansion. Thousands of new housing units. A Boston Marathon memorial pedestrian overpass. A hulking Olympic stadium. A new West Station that could provide a rapid transit rail link between Allston and Cambridge.” – excerpt from Plans for straightening Mass. Pike stir expansive visions, article by Martine Powers, Boston Globe, 4/10/2014. Photo by Jonathan Wiggs / Globe Staff.

FULL ARTICLE:
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2014/04/09/highway-project-holds-promise-for-revamped-region/2lCX89t55FWnHWSxmZe2xM/story.html

HANDOUT: A More Robust DCR

HANDOUT: A More Robust DCR

This is an informational handout that was part of the 2014 Bike/Walk Summit presented by MassBike and WalkBoston.

The Issue – The Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) owns and manages off-road paths and on street facilities for bicyclists and pedestrians throughout the Commonwealth. These facilities serve as essential active transportation corridors for local residents. As bicycling and walking continue to grow statewide, more residents are utilizing these facilities year-round and not just during warmer months.

DCR has been an active and positive partner in recent conversations with the advocacy community about how to bring agency policies around maintenance and snow removal into alignment with the use of their facilities as essential corridors for non-motorized transportation.

DCR’s budget has been cut by approximately 20% since 2008. These deep budget cuts have led to park closures, unstaffed campgrounds and unmaintained facilities.* DCR has committed to making bicycle and pedestrian transportation a priority on their facilities year-round, but the agency needs additional resources and investments to make this commitment a reality.

Ensuring that bicyclists and pedestrians can utilize our on- and off-road transportation infrastructure year-round is an essential component of achieving statewide mode shift goals.

The Ask – Funding decisions for the FY15 budget are being made right now, and we need our legislators to make sure that DCR has the resources to maintain its facilities in a manner suitable for year-round transportation.

Please ask your legislator to support increased funding for DCR parks in the FY15 budget, and urge them to provide DCR with adequate funding for its day-to-day operations and seasonal staffing so Massachusetts residents can safely use on- and off-road paths and parkways.

If you use a DCR path or parkway for your daily transportation or recreational needs, tell your legislator how increased funding for DCR would improve your ability to safely and conveniently access your destinations throughout the year.

*Source: Environmental League of Massachusetts (http://environmentalleague.org/)