Author: WalkMassachusetts

Comments on FEIR for Government Center Garage

Comments on FEIR for Government Center Garage

October 24, 2014

Secretary Maeve Vallely Bartlett
Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA)
Attn: MEPA Office EEA #14069
100 Cambridge St., Suite 900
Boston MA 02114

RE: Comments on the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Redevelopment of the Government Center Garage, MEPA #15134

Dear Secretary Vallely Bartlett:

WalkBoston has reviewed this document to identify potential implications for pedestrians. We offer the following comments.

Sidewalk Widths

The FEIR contains detailed drawings of sidewalk widths at all locations, and WalkBoston believes that the widths are completely adequate, except as noted below at the outer bus bays facing the Greenway. On map B.2 – Conceptual Improvement Plan, Bus Bays #4, 5, and 6 are shown with sidewalks that are only 8.5 feet wide, compared with those of Bus Bays #1, 2, and 3, which have 15 foot sidewalks without encroachments. Bays 4, 5, and 6 also appear to have a line of windbreaks that encroach on the 8.5’ width. No benches are shown, but the text response to our DEIR comments states that, “Additional measures, such as windbreaks and seating areas will also be incorporated into the reconfigured Haymarket Bus Station area.” The relatively narrow sidewalk coupled with windbreaks and potentially benches as well, could make the sidewalk uncomfortably narrow and crowded at Bays 4, 5, and 6. We urge the proponent to consider a modest re-distribution of space to provide wider sidewalks at these bus stops.

Truck loading bays

WalkBoston continues to be concerned about loading docks that require trucks to back from the major adjoining streets into the building. Two of these streets are major access ways into Central Artery (I-93) and will require very careful operation to be safe for both pedestrians and other vehicles. Clear and enforced management should stipulate that they will not be used, except in emergencies, during daytime working and peak travel times.

Cut-ins on sidewalks

Cut-ins proposed on three sides of the East Parcel and two sides of the West Parcel should also be managed to reduce conflicts with pedestrians as loading and unloading occurs from vehicles. Management of the site should ensure that use of the cut-ins for deliveries (not for guest or resident drop off) is minimized during busy portions of the day or evening.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important project. Please feel free to contact us if there are any questions.

 Sincerely,

Robert Sloane
Senior Planner

Revere Safe Routes to School Program Results

Revere Safe Routes to School Program Results

Revere Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program Results September 2012 – May 2014
The Revere SRTS Program was designed to increase the number of children walking to elementary school by providing safety training, encouragement programs, on-­‐street improvements to traffic safety, and education to students and their families. Nationally, SRTS programs have increased student physical activity and strengthened communities, while decreasing traffic congestion around schools.

The specific program goal is to shift children’s travel from their parent’s cars to walking trips. The motivations of participants, parents, municipal staff, WalkBoston and program funders have been diverse, ranging from improving children’s health to enhancing community-­‐school connections to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from school trips.

Summary of Results
During its first two years the program has been very successful.

  • With all six Revere elementary schools participating the number of students who live within a half mile of school have increased by 100%, 69%, 44%, 11%, 5% and 2%. (See Figure 1 and Table 1.)
  • This increase comprises approximately 470 more students regularly walking to school in Revere each day.
  • The shift in travel mode has also resulted in an estimated reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Revere of approximately 177.47 tons of GHG annually (to be confirmed by MAPC). Because mode shift programs are so difficult to track at the community level, WalkBoston is very pleased to have the tools and datea to show this reduction.

Read the full report here:

WalkBoston Revere SRTS Results

Comments on Haverhill Walkway

Comments on Haverhill Walkway

September 15, 2014

Secretary Maeve Vallely Bartlett
Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA)
Attn: Anne Canaday
100 Cambridge St., Suite 900
Boston MA 02114

RE: Comments on the Environmental Notification Form for the Haverhill Boardwalk Project
MEPA# 15238

Dear Secretary Vallely Bartlett:

WalkBoston has reviewed the ENF and we offer the following comments about its impacts on walkers.

The proposed project is quite small – about 450 feet long and 16-17 feet wide with wood decking for the boardwalk, totaling about 46,200 square feet (about 1.1 acres). It is part of the city’s long-range plan for a walkway loop around the downtown portion of the riverbanks, accessed via paved parking areas and public alleys that are adjacent to occupied buildings in downtown Haverhill.

When completed, the boardwalk will link to already-completed walks and become part of a 1,200 foot long walkway. It will also be part of a longer-range Merrimack River Walkway connecting to other cities. In this riverside setting, the project will include utility work, piles for boardwalk support, lighting on the boardwalk deck, benches and planting boxes and two stairways on the riverside floodwall to accommodate a future residential gangways and dock systems in the river.

The size of the project cannot reflect the extraordinary amount of diligence and patience it takes to build small increments of a larger plan. We applaud the city for its work in constructing this facility, and wish it well in further efforts to build the pathway.

We do have a few concerns that we hope can be addressed as the project moves forward.

• The design appears to call for on-land piles that raise the walkway about 7 feet above grade. Since the walkway is some 16-17 feet wide, we wonder about the space under the walkway. The space may become worrisome if it is left open for easy access, and if no alternative uses can be found for it. Is there a plan for enclosure of the space under the walkway to keep it safe and secure and to minimize maintenance problems that might arise?

• We wonder how this small portion of the path will help to encourage people to use the new and existing riverfront walkway until the full pathway can be constructed. The city should explore ways of marketing the boardwalk while the full project still lies in the future.

• Our understanding of the project is that it will connect to an existing walkway on its west end that has ramps leading toward the grade of Merrimack Street. There appears to be no such connection on the east end. We found a reference to a “Merrimack Place landward access stairway” on page 7 of the ENF, but saw no plans of how it would be sited in relation to the walkway. Will the elevated walkway – some 7’ above grade level and still elevated at Merrimack Place –have stairway or ramp access at its east end?

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this interesting and important project.

Sincerely,

Robert Sloane
Senior Planner

Comment letter: Supporting the Whittier Choice Neighborhoods Initiative

Comment letter: Supporting the Whittier Choice Neighborhoods Initiative

July 24, 2014

Wenda Tai, Real Estate Department
Boston Housing Authority
52 Chauncy St., 8th floor
Boston, MA 02111

Dear Ms. Tai: WalkBoston strongly supports the Implementation Phase of the Whittier Choice Neighborhoods Initiative.

The Choice Neighborhoods Initiative comes at a very opportune time. It presents a unique chance to build upon the many transportation and development projects that have begun in Roxbury– the planning area for the Whittier Choice Neighborhood– over the past five years. The City of Boston’s commitment to encouraging walking, bicycling and transit via the Complete Streets Policy adopted two years ago, continues to contribute to the revitalization of Dudley Square and illustrates the benefits of including easy pedestrian access in the Whittier Choice Neighborhood Initiative.

In the coming year, the Complete Streets principles will be applied to the re-design of Melnea Cass, an arterial boulevard in the northern section of the project area. The community has already engaged in a three year planning process of re-design, and implementation funds are available. Alongside re-building Whittier Street Housing, the Initiative can use Complete Streets strategies to achieve the Initiative’s goal of integrating the residents of Whittier Street Housing and Madison Park Village into the overall Roxbury community. Such strategies include slowing traffic on Melnea Cass Boulevard and making it safer and easier for pedestrians to cross Melnea Cass Boulevard, Malcolm X Boulevard and Tremont Street.

After working with many community groups and local residents, WalkBoston agrees with and endorses the recommendations of residents about improving walking connections linking Madison Park Village, Whittier Street Housing and nearby destinations, notably Dudley Square and parks and fitness facilities. In several community meetings that WalkBoston attended, we noted that residents did not indicate high levels of usage or identification with nearby Ruggles Station and the adjoining Southwest Corridor Park– a five mile linear park that includes walking, jogging and bicycle paths as well as tennis and basketball courts, and playgrounds. WalkBoston firmly recommends that a key portion of the Initiative should enable easy access to this major recreational resource.

Residents did express strong interest in safe and direct walking routes to Dudley Square, the commercial and historical heart of Roxbury. To create the lively, human scale community that residents envision, safe and convenient walking connections need to be made between housing and nearby destinations.

In addition to Dudley Station, which provides bus service throughout the City, the Square has restaurants, shops and social services. Dudley Square is also experiencing a renaissance as  historical buildings that defined the Square, the Ferdinand, Waterman and Curtis buildings, are being or have been renovated and new office uses like the Boston School Department will relocate there.

WalkBoston looks forward to working with the community on the following walking projects during the Implementation Phase.

1. Provide better street- and sidewalk-level visibility for many of the area’s recreational facilities that are not highly identifiable because of the superblock on Malcolm X between Shawmut and Columbus/Tremont. The Campus High Urban Renewal parcel is a barrier not only for abutters, but other residents of Lower Roxbury.

2. Improve walking connections for residents of Whittier Housing and Madison Park to reach Dudley Square. Residents say the most highly used walking route is along Ruggles Street that runs directly from the housing developments to Dudley. Of particular concern is the intersection of Ruggles/Shawmut where drivers along one-way Shawmut fail to yield to walkers.

3. Improve walking connections between housing and the Post Office at the Shawmut Avenue/Malcolm X Intersection and the Social Security Office on Malcolm X Blvd near Dudley Street.

4. Create a more direct and visibly obvious route from Madison Park and Whittier to the track facilities at Reggie Lewis Track and Athletic Center. The Athletic Center is a major recreational resource for this neighborhood. Residents can easily access these facilities without crossing any major roadways, but its location is not highly visible.

5. Assess the potential of the proposed Fitness Loop to meet resident needs/interest for a formalized walking route. The Loop would circle the Whittier/Madison Park neighborhood, running along Malcolm X Blvd, Tremont Street, Melnea Cass Blvd and Washington Street. While the Loop layout has an aesthetic appeal, pedestrians do not generally seek out walkways along heavily traveled roadways and transportation corridors. Instead they prefer walking routes that incorporate multiple destinations, such as shops and restaurants. Additionally, cars tend to travel much more slowly along such routes than along the arterial roadways that make up much of the proposed fitness route.

In summary, WalkBoston looks to the Implementation Plan to address the creation of improved pedestrian access through short blocks, safe street crossings, and improved connections to the many extant recreational facilities in the area.

Sincerely,

Dorothea Hass
Senior Project Manger

cc: Patrick Hoey, Boston Transportation Department
Friends of Melnea Cass Boulevard

Revere Walking Map

Revere Walking Map

In 1895, landscape architect Charles Eliot was hired to restore the great crescent of the beach permanently for bathing, promenading, eating, socializing and ocean viewing. A narrow gauge railroad led to beach amenities like open-air bathhouses with bathing suits rented for 25 cents/hour. Rules of the era prohibited bathers from crossing the boulevard in bathing suits, so a tunnel was built under it. A clock faced the beach reminding bathers when their bathing suit rental period was ending.

The beach was lined with grand hotels, four large roller coasters, carousels with handcarved horses five deep, fun houses and bowling alleys. The world-famous Cyclone Coaster had a vertical drop of 100 feet with speeds of 50 mph. Revere Beach has many historical structures preserved from its past: the clock, beachside pavilions, William G. Reinstein Bandstand, the Captain’s House and a police station topped with the 6-foot long copper codfish weathervane from the former bathhouse.


Click for “WalkBoston’s Revere Walking Map” on Google Maps