Author: WalkBoston

Comment Letter Re: Support for H.3437, An Act requiring backup cameras on certain vehicles

Comment Letter Re: Support for H.3437, An Act requiring backup cameras on certain vehicles

By |

January 18th, 2022

Joint Committee on Transportation
Representative William Straus, Chair

Re: Support for H.3437, An Act requiring backup cameras on certain vehicles

Dear Chairman Straus, Vice Chairs Keenan and Devers, and members of the committee,

Members of the Massachusetts Vision Zero Coalition respectfully request that the committee report out favorably on H.3437 An Act requiring backup cameras on certain vehicles.

H.3437 An Act requiring backup cameras on certain vehicles would require the Registrar of Motor Vehicles to include regulations around having rear visibility camera systems, or “backup” cameras for motor vehicles over 10,000 pounds that are owned or leased by the commonwealth or a city or town of the commonwealth. As of May 2018, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration requires all new vehicles to be manufactured with backup cameras. However, this only applies to vehicles under 10,000 pounds, meaning large trucks are not included in this law. These large trucks have significant blind spots¹, making it challenging for drivers to see what is behind them when backing up. Requiring backup cameras could be an important safety measure for preventing backover crashes involving large trucks and vehicles, and protecting vulnerable road users like people walking and biking—particularly children and older adults who are most impacted by these kinds of crashes².

In Massachusetts over the last five years (2017-2021), there have been 33 crashes involving trucks backing up and people walking, resulting in 2 fatalities³. Additionally, two workers at a construction site in Boston were struck and killed when a co-worker backed up a truck and pushed them into a trench in February 2021. While the ownership history of all of these trucks is unknown, we are confident that beginning with state- and municipally-owned vehicles will act as a model for private operators to install video technology; the impact of which will help prevent the needless loss of life of people walking on roadways and sidewalks in Massachusetts.

Implementing these requirements, particularly when paired with other truck safety measures included in H.3549 An Act to reduce traffic fatalities, would make measurable improvements for the safety of vulnerable road users around large trucks.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

The Massachusetts Vision Zero Coalition

Cheryl Pavlik, Allston Brighton Health Collaborative
Galen Mook, Massachusetts Bicycle Coalition
Jarred Johnson, TransitMatters
Adam Shutes, WalkUP Roslindale
Becca Wolfson, Boston Cyclists Union
Stacey Beuttell, WalkBoston
Janie Katz-Christy, Green Streets Initiative
Emily Stein, Safe Roads Alliance
Alex Epstein, Somerville Alliance for Safe Streets
Julia Wallerce, Institute for Transportation and Development Policy
Catherine Gleason, LivableStreets Alliance
Josh Ostroff, Transportation for Massachusetts

¹ Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/ourroads/large-blind-spots)
² NHTSA Report on Backover Crashes (https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/811144.pdf)
³ MassDOT IMPACT portal (https://apps.impact.dot.state.ma.us/cdp/home)

Comment Letter Re: Opposition to H.3399, An Act relative to increasing penalties for texting and driving

Comment Letter Re: Opposition to H.3399, An Act relative to increasing penalties for texting and driving

By |

January 18th, 2022

Joint Committee on Transportation
Representative William Straus, Chair

Re: Opposition to H.3399, An Act relative to increasing penalties for texting and driving

Dear Chairman Straus, Vice Chairs Keenan and Devers, and members of the committee,

Members of the Massachusetts Vision Zero Coalition respectfully oppose H.3399 An Act relative to increasing penalties for texting and driving.

H.3399 An Act relative to increasing penalties for texting and driving would increase fees from a first offense from $100 to $250, and would escalate at a greater rate for subsequent offenses—$500 for a second and$750 for a third. In addition to increased fines, a license suspension of 90 days could be issued for the first offense of texting and driving. This escalation of harmful and punitive measures is a problem for a few reasons:

  1. Research has shown that increasing the severity of punishment is an ineffective deterrent to crime, and often worsens racial and economic disparities¹, suggesting that increasing penalties would not have the intended effect of lowering the number of people texting and driving.
  2. Data on the hands free law in MA has shown that this law is being inequitably enforced². In traffic stops for using a phone while driving between April and December 2019, Black, Hispanic, and Asian people were more likely to be issued citations than white people for the same infraction. The increased punitive measures proposed in this legislation will disproportionately burden Black drivers and drivers of color in Massachusetts.
  3. These large fines can be debilitating for lower income individuals who may not be able to afford them, and as the law is currently written, non-payment of these fines can compound with late fees and can result in debt-based license suspensions and potential incarceration—an inequitable and ineffective practice that forces individuals to make the impossible choice between driving on a suspended license, risking additional fines and incarceration, or risk being unable to get to work and lose the income they need to access and afford essential services, much less pay their fine (note: there are other bills in this committee that would eliminate this practice that the Coalition is supportive of—H.3453 and S.2304).

While we know that distracted driving is a safety concern on our roads, we don’t believe these punitive measures are the solution. We ask that the committee take this into account with respect to this proposed legislation and oppose H.3399.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

The Massachusetts Vision Zero Coalition

Cheryl Pavlik, Allston Brighton Health Collaborative
Jarred Johnson, TransitMatters
Becca Wolfson, Boston Cyclists Union
Stacey Beuttell, WalkBoston
Emily Stein, Safe Roads Alliance
Julia Wallerce, Institute for Transportation and Development Policy
Catherine Gleason, LivableStreets Alliance
Galen Mook, Massachusetts Bicycle Coalition
Adam Shutes, WalkUP Roslindale

¹ National Institute of Justice (https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/five-things-about-deterrence)
² Hands Free Data in MA (https://www.wcvb.com/article/massachusetts-data-white-drivers-got-more-breaks-for-hands-free-cellphone-violations/35421474#)

Main Street and Union Street West Springfield Walk Audit

Main Street and Union Street West Springfield Walk Audit

By |

On Monday, November 15, 2021, with an invitation from the Town of West Springfield’s Mass in Motion coordinator, Becky Basch, Senior Planner at the Pioneer Valley Commission, WalkBoston led a walk audit focused on the areas surrounding Main  The Town of West Springfield, and this residential area, is home to a diverse population with many languages and cultures represented.

The purpose for this walk audit was to follow up on a Park Access Project completed through the Mass in Motion program in 2019, that found that the Merrick neighborhood has the highest density of residential development and the smallest amount of park land available to residents in the immediate areas. As the Town has plans to make improvements on Main Street in 2022, the Department of Public Works is open to including recommendations from the Walk Audit in its plans.  The Town is also planning to make improvements on Union Street in the next few years and is looking to improve connections for bicycle users to current projects on Memorial Ave and Park Drive. 

The walk audit included portions of Main Street and Union Street that are home to popular markets, a food pantry, a charter school, Ascentria Care Alliance, and Main Street Playground. The recommendations provided in this report are broken down into both short- and long-term recommendations, which can provide temporary traffic calming measures and improved pedestrian infrastructure while more long-term interventions are planned. 

Read the full report here.

Cummington Walk Audit

Cummington Walk Audit

By |

The Hilltowns CDC, together with Healthy Hampshire and WalkBoston, are leading a 5-year grant project to promote Age-Friendly Walkability in the Hilltowns Town Centers. Together with community residents and leaders, the team will be conducting a series of walk audits in partnering Hilltowns. The goal of these walk audits is to identify infrastructure improvements and policy changes to make town-center walking safer and more enjoyable for people of all ages in the Hilltowns. The Town of Cummington is one of the partnering communities in this grant project.

Read the full report here.

Chesterfield Town Center Walk Audit

Chesterfield Town Center Walk Audit

By |

The Hilltowns CDC, together with Healthy Hampshire and WalkBoston, are leading a 5-year grant project to promote Age-Friendly Walkability in the Hilltowns Town Centers. Together with community residents and leaders, the team will be conducting a series of walk audits in partnering Hilltowns. The goal of these walk audits is to identify infrastructure improvements and policy changes to make town-center walking safer and more enjoyable for people of all ages in the Hilltowns. The Town of Chesterfield is one of the partnering communities in this grant project.

Read the full report here.